From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed |
Date: | 2025-09-17 20:45:14 |
Message-ID: | aMsd2o9Hfd3QvkTq@momjian.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 11:46:58AM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I suggest the following alternative, which has the merit of being a
> bit less verbose:
>
> "Skip scan allows B-Tree index scans to find the most efficient way of
> navigating through a multicolumn index when one or more of its columns
> initially lacks a = condition and comes before a column that is
> directly used by the query. Such an index scan can now be broken down
> into multiple "index searches" by generating an implementation level =
> condition on any underspecified columns. This allows the scan to skip
> over irrelevant sections of the index, though only when the generated
> = condition is on a column that has relatively few distinct values."
>
> Note that "index searches" is a term that now appears in EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
I went with this text, which is more "aspirational" rather than
"proscriptive", and the right level of detail:
This allows multi-column btree indexes to be used in more cases
such as when there are no restrictions on the first or early
indexed columns (or they are non-equality ones), and there are
useful restrictions on later indexed columns.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-09-17 20:54:16 | Re: New string-truncation warnings from GCC 15 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-17 20:38:56 | Re: New string-truncation warnings from GCC 15 |