Re: Remove PointerIsValid()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove PointerIsValid()
Date: 2025-09-17 22:36:03
Message-ID: aMs30_uaXfg_GqjP@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 11:21:10AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:15:10AM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> There were the usual concerns about code churn and backpatching and so
>>> on, but I think in the end the change is not that big and it's in pretty
>>> boring positions.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> +1

The locations patched don't really worry me, so the removal of the
macro is fine for me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-17 22:50:06 Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-17 22:26:47 Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset