| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | REPACK and naming |
| Date: | 2025-09-16 16:40:46 |
| Message-ID: | aMmTDu6cGDqxqgb4@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I am starting to get worried about the confusing of adding a REPACK
command. We already have a lot of confusion around vacuum and analyze:
* autoanalyze does vacuum and analyze
* VACUUM FULL is much different from VACUUM
It seems if we add REPACK as a command, it is somewhere between VACUUM
FULL and VACUUM in severity/impact. Should we be rethinking the naming
in this area?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-09-16 17:59:07 | Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed |
| Previous Message | Shirisha Shirisha | 2025-09-16 16:37:48 | Re: Proposal to allow DELETE/UPDATE on partitioned tables with unsupported foreign partitions |