Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Borisov <lex(dot)borisov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Date: 2025-09-16 13:58:36
Message-ID: aMltDOGkv02460XS@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 10:53:23PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 04:45, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > I have committd the first draft of the PG 18 release notes. The item
> > count looks strong:
>
> Since we're getting close to the release. I wanted to call out that I
> still think this commit[1] should be made part of the release notes,
> because it significantly improves performance of the common functions
> lower() and upper().
>
> Note that this change is actually mentioned in the first release
> post[2], so it seems strange not to have it in the release notes.
>
> [1]: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=27bdec06841d1bb004ca7627eac97808b08a7ac7
> [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-18-beta-1-released-3070/

You received an answer in May 2025:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/aBbBFG8Z32ke31sF%40momjian.us#5e9d0f9bf3da039bc2d5afb8f2d847fb

with some additional replies. I did not see any feedback indicating we
should make a change for this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-09-16 14:17:42 Re: plan shape work
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-09-16 13:45:10 Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?