| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x |
| Date: | 2025-09-11 12:28:06 |
| Message-ID: | aMLAVqeO5MuNcf0V@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Andres Freund
> Hm, that could just be a "harmless" race. Does it still happen if you apply
> the attached patch in addition?
> diff --git i/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_database.c w/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_database.c
Debian is still carrying that patch around. Did we ever get to any
conclusion on that issue?
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-09-11 12:43:35 | Re: Making type Datum be 8 bytes everywhere |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-09-11 12:07:29 | Re: ALTER DATABASE RESET with unexistent guc doesn't report an error |