Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Date: 2025-09-10 16:25:15
Message-ID: aMGma-VYsb2NPUrG@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:11:49PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 10:39 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> My first instinct was to consider this for back-patching, but I see that
>> you didn't back-patch commit 9af672b.  Is there any technical reason we
>> shouldn't be back-patching these types of meson build script changes?
>
> I think you are right, I can't see any harm in backporting it, and
> arguably it's a bug: it would be annoying to compare performance across
> different versions with different build flags.
>
> I backported through 16.

Cool. I committed/back-patched the numeric.c fix to v16 as well.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-09-10 16:30:06 Re: someone else to do the list of acknowledgments
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2025-09-10 16:19:47 Re: someone else to do the list of acknowledgments