From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default? |
Date: | 2025-09-10 16:25:15 |
Message-ID: | aMGma-VYsb2NPUrG@nathan |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:11:49PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 10:39 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> My first instinct was to consider this for back-patching, but I see that
>> you didn't back-patch commit 9af672b. Is there any technical reason we
>> shouldn't be back-patching these types of meson build script changes?
>
> I think you are right, I can't see any harm in backporting it, and
> arguably it's a bug: it would be annoying to compare performance across
> different versions with different build flags.
>
> I backported through 16.
Cool. I committed/back-patched the numeric.c fix to v16 as well.
--
nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-09-10 16:30:06 | Re: someone else to do the list of acknowledgments |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-09-10 16:19:47 | Re: someone else to do the list of acknowledgments |