Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Date: 2025-09-09 15:39:41
Message-ID: aMBKPf5rVZTqCSNH@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 01:35:02PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-09-08 at 15:14 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> I think we need to do something similar for numeric.c.
>
> Good catch. Patch LGTM.

Thanks for reviewing.

My first instinct was to consider this for back-patching, but I see that
you didn't back-patch commit 9af672b. Is there any technical reason we
shouldn't be back-patching these types of meson build script changes?

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-09-09 16:00:26 Re: plan shape work
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-09-09 15:32:10 Re: Expose custom planning data in EXPLAIN