Re: 回复: Fix segfault while accessing half-initialized hash table in pgstat_shmem.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mikhail Kot <mikhail(dot)kot(at)databricks(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "to(at)myrrc(dot)dev" <to(at)myrrc(dot)dev>
Subject: Re: 回复: Fix segfault while accessing half-initialized hash table in pgstat_shmem.c
Date: 2025-09-03 09:43:20
Message-ID: aLgNuGcQ8NAANUp7@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 07:22:00AM +0000, Steven Niu wrote:
> So unless dsa_allocate() can ensure never returns InvalidDsaPointer,
> there is risk of SegV. In fact the function dsa_allocate() does
> return InvalidDsaPointer in some cases.
>
> So, maybe should we add pointer check in all places where dsa_get_address is called. Comments?

dsa_allocate() calls dsa_allocate_extended() without DSA_ALLOC_NO_OOM,
hence on allocation failure the code does a ereport(ERROR). It would
be a problem to not check the result if DSA_ALLOC_NO_OOM is used.

The problem dealt with here is different, as far as I understand: we
set some data in shared memory without considering that the DSA
allocation could fail, leaving shared memory in an inconsistent state
when an allocation failure occurs. The problem is not in the
allocation failure in itself, but in the dependency that we have
between the state in shared memory and the allocation attempt for this
pgstats code path.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2025-09-03 09:49:32 Unexpected changes of CurrentResourceOwner and CurrentMemoryContext
Previous Message Richard Guo 2025-09-03 09:39:29 Re: Generate GUC tables from .dat file