Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1
Date: 2025-08-31 18:11:29
Message-ID: aLSQUf_UgZV8HQ9-@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> > On 30.08.25 18:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I suppose that the expectation is that every release note item
> >> will be credited to someone. Why does this item lack a credit?
>
> > Maybe I'm understanding this differently, but the "Migration" section
> > ought to be advice about the migration, which is not a place to
> > communicate credit. In the case I added, the item is the result of some
> > changes that are already listed and credited elsewhere in the "Changes"
> > section.
>
> One answer could be to remove the commit-details comment block from
> that item, thereby making the added URL go away too. However, that
> will look a bit odd when the neighboring items all have credits and
> URLs.

Yes, and that would make it hard to find the commit used for the change,
which can be helpful for users.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-08-31 18:51:40 Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-08-31 18:10:30 Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1