From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |
Date: | 2025-08-31 18:11:29 |
Message-ID: | aLSQUf_UgZV8HQ9-@momjian.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> > On 30.08.25 18:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I suppose that the expectation is that every release note item
> >> will be credited to someone. Why does this item lack a credit?
>
> > Maybe I'm understanding this differently, but the "Migration" section
> > ought to be advice about the migration, which is not a place to
> > communicate credit. In the case I added, the item is the result of some
> > changes that are already listed and credited elsewhere in the "Changes"
> > section.
>
> One answer could be to remove the commit-details comment block from
> that item, thereby making the added URL go away too. However, that
> will look a bit odd when the neighboring items all have credits and
> URLs.
Yes, and that would make it hard to find the commit used for the change,
which can be helpful for users.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-08-31 18:51:40 | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-08-31 18:10:30 | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |