From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Per backend relation statistics tracking |
Date: | 2025-08-28 16:05:12 |
Message-ID: | aLB+OLNmXCCnRg3p@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 01:57:13PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:55:09PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> > I worry that a single view will grow very wide, and we will have to eventually
> > split it. So we may as well start thinking about having multiple views
> > in advance.
>
> I gave it more thoughts and I now think that multiple views is better. We
> could start with pg_stat_backend_relations here.
>
PFA v3, using pg_stat_backend_relation instead of pg_stat_backend.
In passing, adding PGDLLIMPORT for backend_has_relstats and PendingBackendStats
that were missing in v2.
As compared to v1, only 0001 and 0002 are shared. Let's discuss those first before
moving foward with 0003+.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Adding-per-backend-relation-statistics-tracking.patch | text/x-diff | 6.6 KB |
v3-0002-Adding-the-pg_stat_backend_relation-view.patch | text/x-diff | 11.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-08-28 16:07:40 | Re: Adding per backend commit and rollback counters |
Previous Message | Fabrice Chapuis | 2025-08-28 15:41:18 | Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover |