From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: VM corruption on standby |
Date: | 2025-08-25 15:07:26 |
Message-ID: | aKx8Lg6NKRDBz6u9@nathan |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[RMT hat]
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 06:42:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Therefore, I vote for reverting bc22dc0e0. Hopefully only
>>> temporarily, but it's too late to figure out another way for v18,
>>> and I don't think that bc22dc0e0 is such an essential improvement
>>> that we can't afford to give it up for v18.
>
>> I'm OK about this. Do you mind if I revert bc22dc0e0 myself?
>
> Not at all, go for it.
Now that this is reverted, can the related open item be marked as resolved?
--
nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-08-25 15:11:25 | Re: use PqMsg macros in fe-protocol3.c |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-08-25 14:57:00 | use PqMsg macros in fe-protocol3.c |