Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 08:09:53AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 05:53:44PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
>> > (or some other shmem-based
>> > data structure we have yet to introduce, like a dslist/dsarray).
>>
>> This will be an interesting API to invest time in, if there could be more
>> use-cases.
>
> I did a quick check and I did not find current use cases: possible candidates
> could be in ExecParallelHashTableAlloc(), PTIterationArray, PTEntryArray for
> examples but I think they all know the final size upfront so there is no real
> need for dsarray for those).
>
>> I think it's a separate discussion at this point.
>
> OTOH, that would be a valid use case to introduce this new API but I'm not sure
> it's worth it given that the dshash looks good enough for our case (even if not
> ideal though).

IMHO it'd be okay to proceed with dshash for now. It would be pretty easy
to switch to something like a "dslist" in the future.

--
nathan