| From: | Ken Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |
| Date: | 2025-08-26 14:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | aK3BcS9OZ/K+2TZA@customer.dllstxx1.pop.starlinkisp.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
> > But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused
> > more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's and
> > cast in switches.
>
> +1
>
> May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that after add-moissing-memory-barrier
> patch was applied nobody reproduced assertion failure with replaced
> bitfields.
>
Hi,
I am just a lurker but that was what I saw happen too. No problem with
the replaced bitfields.
Regards,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Damien Clochard | 2025-08-26 14:17:03 | Re: [PATCH] Generate random dates/times in a specified range |
| Previous Message | Kirk Wolak | 2025-08-26 14:11:43 | Re: [WiP] B-tree page merge during vacuum to reduce index bloat |