| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Let plan_cache_mode to be a little less strict |
| Date: | 2025-08-04 04:23:26 |
| Message-ID: | aJA1votIsIHkQHSL@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:07:08PM +0200, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> I considered the worker_spi.c module, which demonstrates various SPI usage
> patterns. It might be more beneficial to use this instead of creating
> another test module, isn't it?
worker_spi is a playground for bgworker tests, so I'm not eager to
make it more complex for the case of cached planned. SQL tests have
more benefits here, IMO, and they should be more efficient and more
predictible. worker_spi can only work with TAP.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-08-04 04:33:06 | Re: A little cosmetic to convert_VALUES_to_ANY() |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-08-04 04:19:46 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX |