Re: vacuumdb changes for stats import/export

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuumdb changes for stats import/export
Date: 2025-07-28 18:46:34
Message-ID: aIfFinYmZuCIp_qw@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 09:22:29AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Monday, July 28, 2025, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 7/28/25 16:47, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> Obviously, this wording isn't clear enough. We might need to either
>>> remove that sentence or add "When used in conjunction with
>>> --analyze-in-stages..."
>>
>> I vote for the second option.
>
> Makes sense.

It seems like there is some support for adding "When used in conjunction
with --analyze in stages..." to the beginning of the sentence. I'll give
it another day or two for any further discussion before committing.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-07-28 18:54:52 Re: PG 18 beta1 release notes misses mention of pg_noreturn
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-28 18:42:11 Re: Better HINT message for "unexpected data beyond EOF"