From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IndexAmRoutine aminsertcleanup function can be NULL? |
Date: | 2025-07-24 04:44:54 |
Message-ID: | aIG6RjB-GCMMMZNI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 12:07:56PM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
> PFA to assert all required IndexAM callbacks are present.
@@ -42,6 +42,19 @@ GetIndexAmRoutine(Oid amhandler)
elog(ERROR, "index access method handler function %u did not return an IndexAmRoutine struct",
amhandler);
+ /* Assert that all required callbacks are present. */
+ Assert(routine->ambuild != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->ambuildempty != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->aminsert != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->ambulkdelete != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amvacuumcleanup != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amcostestimate != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amoptions != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amvalidate != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->ambeginscan != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amrescan != NULL);
+ Assert(routine->amendscan != NULL);
Oh. I like that, and I would like to apply it on HEAD if there are no
objections.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-07-24 06:54:26 | Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-07-24 04:35:58 | Re: Regression with large XML data input |