Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, "Burd, Greg" <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)
Date: 2025-07-19 05:04:52
Message-ID: aHsndCH0BgRbw5wb@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:24:12PM +0300, Nikita Malakhov wrote:
> I'm currently debugging POC direct tids TOAST patch (on top of your branch),
> will mail it in a day or two.

Interesting. Of course I may be wrong because I have no idea of how
you have shaped things, still I suspect that for the basics you should
just need 0003, 0004, the parts with the GUC to switch the TOAST table
type and the dump/restore/upgrade bits.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhang Mingli 2025-07-19 05:15:04 Re: Even when the data is already ordered, MergeAppend still adds a Sort node
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-07-19 05:02:09 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication