Re: fix organization wording in psql's \copyright command

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix organization wording in psql's \copyright command
Date: 2025-07-16 16:55:48
Message-ID: aHfZlLQS1VlSsJ20@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Committed. Thanks for the prompt reviews.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:29:32AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 15 Jul 2025, at 00:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I wonder if we missed any other places ... grepping for
>> "Postgres95" didn't find any, but ...
>
> Grepping around with a bit of fuzzy matching I too was unable to find more
> omissions.

Same.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-07-16 17:03:44 Re: pg_dumpall dumps global objects with --statistics-only or --no-schema
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-07-16 16:46:06 Re: Collation and primary keys