From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | beta packages and debug_assertions |
Date: | 2025-07-22 17:55:58 |
Message-ID: | aH_QrqvKaRolz4ph@pryzbyj2023 |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Hi,
Historically we've run our product under centos, but more recently have
been running under debian. Nothing interesting has come up with due to
differences in packaging.
One thing I noticed recently is that the beta RPMs were compiled with
debug assertions, and the DEBs are not.
I wondered that was a deliberate decision. It might be the biggest
difference I've seen so far between the RPM and DEB packaging.
There's an argument for enabling assertions -- the point of running a
beta release is to catch bugs. And an argument for keeping them
disabled -- that allows people to do performance testing, and to run the
beta packages in environments where performance can't take a hard hit
(like an internal development environment).
--
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | apt.postgresql.org Repository Update | 2025-07-22 20:50:09 | timescaledb updated to version 2.21.1+dfsg-1.pgdg+1 |
Previous Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2025-07-22 06:49:59 | Re: Request to Add New Package: pgsentinel |