Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date: 2025-07-11 14:51:40
Message-ID: aHEk_JEoNhIpuHd-@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:49:47PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> Thanks. Looks good to me.

Thank you for reviewing.

> Also just would like to confirm that the pg_dump_sort change will go in a
> different patch.

That's already been committed: http://postgr.es/c/fb6c860.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-11 14:57:02 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-07-11 14:37:24 Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations