On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 09:48:40AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Is this the same issue that was discussed in [1]?
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/OSCPR01MB14966FF9E4C4145F37B937E52F5102@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Ah, indeed, so it was reported a couple of months ago. I am not sure
that the argument about all the other GUCs potentially impacted holds
much value; we are talking about a specific code path.
--
Michael