Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible

From:	Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
Date:	2025-07-02 17:34:23
Message-ID:	aGVtn_IetDzyH9pd@nathan
Views:	Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2025-06-10 16:07:35 from Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>  2025-06-10 16:30:35 from Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>   2025-06-10 23:41:54 from Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎    2025-06-11 11:10:49 from Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>     2025-06-11 11:35:39 from Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>      2025-06-12 19:53:38 from Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>       2025-06-13 01:54:59 from Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>        2025-07-02 17:34:23 from Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible at 2025-06-13 01:54:59 from Junwang Zhao

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Nathan Bossart	2025-07-02 17:37:37	Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Previous Message	vignesh C	2025-07-02 17:20:22	Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly