Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented
Date: 2025-06-30 21:36:02
Message-ID: aGMDQqIVk2bwRNEu@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:54:28PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I noticed that this list of exceptions doesn't exist on v13-v15, presumably
> because the docs for age() and mxid_age() were only back-patched to v16
> (see commits 48b5aa3 and 15afb7d), which is strange because I believe those
> functions are much older. I don't see any discussion about this choice,
> either. We should probably back-patch those commits to v13 as a
> prerequisite to applying this patch.

Spun off a new thread for this:

https://postgr.es/m/aGMCxHxLfeMdQk8m%40nathan

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2025-06-30 21:42:08 Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-30 21:33:56 back-patch documentation for age() and mxid_age()