Re: Move the injection_points extension to contrib?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move the injection_points extension to contrib?
Date: 2025-07-09 00:19:33
Message-ID: aG21lRopWyK8ic7b@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:50:59PM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
> ok, I assume you mean that the requirement for ABI/API stability would make it
> hard to include tests for fixes like [2] in minor releases. Thanks for
> explanation.

You can think about it the same way as we do for regress.so, for
example.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-07-09 00:23:49 Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql
Previous Message Andy Fan 2025-07-09 00:14:38 Re: A assert failure when initdb with track_commit_timestamp=on