| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A assert failure when initdb with track_commit_timestamp=on |
| Date: | 2025-07-08 11:26:45 |
| Message-ID: | aG0AdXyUORztb034@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 02:00:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's a fleshed-out implementation of Hayato-san's idea. I've
> not done anything about reverting 5a6c39b6d, nor have I done any
> checks to see if there are other GUCs we ought to mark similarly.
> (But at this point I'd be prepared to bet that there are.)
I've been reading through the patch (not tested), and no objections
with the concept here. I would have kept that a HEAD-only change due
to the proposed location for SetProcessingMode(), but, well, if I'm
in minority that's fine by me.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eduard Stefes | 2025-07-08 11:46:29 | Re: [V2] Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-07-08 11:19:38 | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |