Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Date: 2025-06-18 20:09:01
Message-ID: aFMc3SheeQxl0QYb@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Nathan Bossart
> I broke this up into several small patches. Notable changes are as
> follows:
>
> * Adjusted to the tab completion code to work more like the VACUUM utility
> options.
>
> * Introduced a new ExecCheckpoint() function in checkpointer.c and moved
> the privilege check and options parsing there.

Ack. I was pondering if the code was growing too big there, but didn't
want to change too many things at once.

> * Removed the notes in the docs about when to use the CHECKPOINT command.
> I'm not opposed to adding something like that (in fact, I think it's a
> good idea), but IMHO we should bikeshed on that separately, maybe even in
> a new thread.

I would have thought this already happened here.

> Thoughts?

Fine with me, thanks!

Christoph

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-06-18 20:21:30 Re: minimum Meson version
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-06-18 20:08:00 Re: minimum Meson version