Re: pg_dump --with-* options

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: 2025-06-13 20:32:40
Message-ID: aEyK6FxJqcv53s8b@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 08:58:04AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 09:39 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> By the way, if we keep --with-statistics in pg_dump, are we planning
>> to
>> continue using the --with-xxx naming pattern for new options that
>> specify extra data to dump?
>
> Good point. Now that we are getting rid of some of the other options,
> we don't need to worry about consistency with them, and I think we
> should just use "--statistics".

+1

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-13 21:28:27 Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-06-13 20:20:49 Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure