Re: Replace some %llu remnants in the tree

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Replace some %llu remnants in the tree
Date: 2025-06-12 14:56:28
Message-ID: aErqnLzYNjL8T3ST@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:16:37AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 09:58:00AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 09.06.25 05:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> That's not necessarily mandatory for v18, for sure, but as this is new
>>> code we could as well clean it up before forking the next stable
>>> branch.
>>
>> Agree this should go into v18.
>
> Thanks for the review. Adding the RMT in CC for more comments. Would
> you be OK with the patch added to v18? The answer is probably yes,
> but let's ask anyway.

Seems fine to me.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-06-12 15:14:55 Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-06-12 14:52:40 Re: pg_restore causing ENOSPACE on the WAL partition. Fundamental issue?