From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | anudeepvattikonda0404(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count() |
Date: | 2025-06-12 14:05:34 |
Message-ID: | aEreruE-8drtSsKt@depesz.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:54:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:03:25AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> >> I am trying to run the below query
> >> select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Bat\b') ;
> >> I was expecting it to return 2 but I see Postgres is returning 0. I see that
> >> there are two matches, cat and flat. All it should do is to look for the
> >> word at whose left side shoudn't be a word boundary while the right side
> >> should be a word boundary
>
> > What makes you think that \B/\b has anything to do with word boundary?
>
> Indeed, they do not.
>
> > As far as I can tell pg regexps have nothing related to word boundaries.
>
> Sure we do, see "Regular Expression Constraint Escapes":
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-matching.html#POSIX-CONSTRAINT-ESCAPES-TABLE
>
> Unfortunately, since these are all way outside the POSIX regexp
> standard, different systems have implemented these extensions
> differently. I don't doubt that \B/\b mean word boundaries
> in some other system.
Oh, Missed that. Thanks.
So the regexp can be rewritten to:
=$ select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Yat\M');
regexp_count
──────────────
2
(1 row)
Best regards,
depesz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-06-12 14:27:12 | Re: BUG #18952: pg_restore --help and document have strange description: Dump something |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-06-12 13:54:46 | Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count() |