Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Date: 2025-06-11 19:51:00
Message-ID: aEneJEgapEJvV8KU@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 02:45:58PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:41 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:42:30AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > > > > "Add an asynchronous I/O subsystem"
> > > I noticed in the PG 17 release notes [1] we did include the shas of
> > > each of the commits for the read stream users. Should we do that here
> > > as well? Those are what enable those operations to use AIO.
> >
> > So, I added the read stream item to PG 17 since that was a new
> > infrastructure feature, but for PG 18, we are just improving that
> > internal infrastructure, so didn't mention it. If you think we should
> > add those commits, I can do it.
>
> I wouldn't consider it as improving internal infrastructure exactly.
> My understanding is that usually when we add new features, even if
> they use an existing API, we still include them, as relevant, in the
> release notes. For example, next release we hope to have index
> prefetching -- but it may be implemented using the read stream API.
> Does that mean we wouldn't mention it in the release notes?

We certainly would mention index prefetching, but probably not the
changes to the read stream API unless those were separately relevant.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-11 19:53:35 Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-06-11 19:40:10 Re: [BUG] Cannot flush buffers of temp table deleted from other session