Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Date: 2025-06-11 13:59:42
Message-ID: aEmLzinvZ-W8EPiW@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:45:46PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Do we want to change the checkpoint log message (and the new options)
> only, or include the CHECKPOINT_* flags? (I would guess there aren't
> many external users of these flags, but mmmv.)

IMO we should try to make the terminology consistent everywhere. I'd
suggest putting the renaming stuff in separate prerequisite patches for
your new CHECKPOINT option.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-06-11 14:03:10 Re: Question on error code selection in conflict detection
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-11 13:57:03 Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry