Re: Encapsulate io_uring process count calculation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Encapsulate io_uring process count calculation
Date: 2025-06-05 00:52:40
Message-ID: aEDqWPmzHyxnWupC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:12:07AM +0800, Japin Li wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 at 13:27, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Sounds like a copy-pasto error to me, so good idea to reuse this
>> routine. pgaio_uring_procs() is only used for shmem sizing and in a
>> check at backend initialization currently.

Hearing nothing, applied that, then.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2025-06-05 01:00:26 Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH
Previous Message jian he 2025-06-05 00:45:10 Re: speedup COPY TO for partitioned table.