Re: Re: proposal: schema variables

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: 2025-05-20 14:56:29
Message-ID: aCyYHXhAjXOUPvLO@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> fresh rebase

I will again ask why this patch set is being reposted when there is no
plan to apply it to git master?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-05-20 14:59:22 Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-05-20 14:42:27 Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2025-05-20 16:33:18 Re: Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-05-18 16:54:24 Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)