| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | acozens(at)pixelpower(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: reindex documentation |
| Date: | 2025-05-21 02:41:16 |
| Message-ID: | aC09TBaiISMUrW9H@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:44:09AM -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Right, following the rules defined internally by ChooseRelationName()
> when creating the new/old indexes in the process. So this could be
> added. Would you like to suggest a rewording of this sentence for the
> extra number optionally appended to the suffix if a duplicated entry
> exists?
Alec's latest message did not reach the lists, but it was only to
suggest a wording for the whole area, as a reply to my previous
message. I've reused most of his words with some slight tweaks,
applied the result down to 13 as 54675d898633, marking him as the
author.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-05-21 06:12:06 | Re: Postgres jsonb data |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-05-20 13:41:30 | Postgres jsonb data |