Re: pgsql: doc: clarify new behavior of max_files_per_process

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: doc: clarify new behavior of max_files_per_process
Date: 2025-04-29 14:26:50
Message-ID: aBDhqsY28LRHhmwp@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 09:52:03AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-04-29 13:45:44 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > doc: clarify new behavior of max_files_per_process
>
> I don't think this really is an improvement - if postmaster is called with a
> bunch of files already opened, they aren't opened by postmaster, but still are
> ignored...

Okay, I was more objecting to the text that wasn't clear; it was:

Sets the maximum number of open files each server subprocess is
allowed to open simultaneously, in addition to the files already
open in postmaster. The default is one thousand files.

The "in addition" wasn't clear to me. I could read it as "adding" the
postmaster file descriptors. I changed it now to:

Sets the maximum number of open files each server subprocess is
allowed to open simultaneously; files opened in the postmaster are
not counted toward this limit. The default is one thousand files.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-04-29 14:29:27 Re: pgsql: doc: clarify new behavior of max_files_per_process
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2025-04-29 14:08:26 Re: extension_control_path and "directory"