Re: Support for runtime parameters in injection points, for AIO tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for runtime parameters in injection points, for AIO tests
Date: 2025-05-08 23:19:39
Message-ID: aB08C_Rn1FMvSJMf@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:16:46PM +0000, Greg Burd wrote:
> IMO seems like a good idea, happy to help further "cleanup the AIO
> code" with some direction as to what needs to be done.

Thanks for posting a rebase. Yes, I would like to clean up that on
HEAD, but it also seems like Andres would prefer let this matter be
handled once v18 is forked on its own branch, so I am not sure how to
proceed here. Avoiding a diff for this new code between v18 and HEAD
would be nicer, IMO, and we're still in early stability period. And
that would be less conflicts when maintaining these tests across
branches.

Have others an opinion to offer here?
--
Michael

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-08 23:47:58 Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-05-08 22:28:24 Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer