| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Enable data checksums by default |
| Date: | 2025-04-23 15:28:22 |
| Message-ID: | aAkHFqfSQcqOVKpy@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Tomas Vondra
> We went through the open items on the RMT team meeting today, and my
> impression was the questions are mostly about performance of having
> checksums by default, but now I realize the thread talks about "upgrade
> experience" which seems fairly wide.
Fwiw, Debian's pg_upgradecluster already knows about that change. With
the default "dump" upgrade method, clusters will be transitioned to
checksums enabled, while "upgrade" (= pg_upgrade) upgrades will stick
with whatever was there before.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2025-04-23 15:39:08 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-04-23 14:53:51 | Re: What's our minimum supported Python version? |