Re: doc patch: clarify the naming rule for injection_points

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:36:20PM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> I also feel just converting lower case is not good. The point seems to locate in
> the end-of-transaction callback and it accepts invalidation messages. Based on the
> fact, how about "inval-process-invalidation-messages"?
> 0002 did simple replacements of these words.

- INJECTION_POINT("heap_update-before-pin");
+ INJECTION_POINT("heap-update-before-pin");

The former name is better IMO. heap_update() is the name of the
function where the point is defined.

- INJECTION_POINT("AtEOXact_Inval-with-transInvalInfo");
+ INJECTION_POINT("inval-process-invalidation-messages");

This naming has been puzzling me, though, so a rename looks fit. I am
not sure that this is the best name that matches with this code path,
as this lacks a reference regarding the end of a transaction. Perhaps
something like "end-transaction-process-inval" would be better?
--
Michael