Re: Logging parallel worker draught

From: Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date: 2026-01-13 09:39:06
Message-ID: a99abd55-267f-48b4-84bc-2892a9e2edc0@dalibo.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/7/26 5:47 PM, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems to have flown under the radar. I still think it's a good
> feature even if we have parallel logging in pg_stat_database and
> pg_stat_statements (e7a9496de and cf54a2c002)

Thank you for your message.

> The latest patchset needs rebasing.

The new patch set is attached.
--
Benoit Lobréau
Consultant
http://dalibo.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Add-a-guc-for-parallel-worker-logging.patch text/x-patch 7.7 KB
v10-0002-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-util.patch text/x-patch 4.0 KB
v10-0003-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-quer.patch text/x-patch 1.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message v@viktorh.net 2026-01-13 09:50:36 Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-01-13 09:31:18 Re: Safer hash table initialization macro