| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Custom explain options |
| Date: | 2024-01-10 06:29:30 |
| Message-ID: | a9522525-8070-4e34-9d88-a8462429e004@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30/11/2023 22:40, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> In all this cases we are using array of `Instrumentation` and if it
> contains varying part, then it is not clear where to place it.
> Yes, there is also code which serialize and sends instrumentations
> between worker processes and I have updated this code in my PR to send
> actual amount of custom instrumentation data. But it can not help with
> the cases above.
What do you think about this really useful feature? Do you wish to
develop it further?
--
regards,
Andrei Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-01-10 06:33:22 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2024-01-10 06:26:08 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |