| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II |
| Date: | 2017-07-14 14:21:09 |
| Message-ID: | a8e4fbb6-35d6-42b7-e36e-a675e2b7b228@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/13/2017 10:46 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Neither is suitable on an unencrypted channel (as has been repeatedly
Please forgive my thinko about md5. I had overlooked the second
salted md5 used in the protocol, and that had to be some years ago
when I was sure I had looked for one in the code. But it's been there
since 2001, so I simply overlooked it somehow. Not sure how. I've had
an unnecessarily jaundiced view of "md5" auth for years as a result.
I feel much better now. Sorry for the noise.
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-07-14 14:37:13 | Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
| Previous Message | Marina Polyakova | 2017-07-14 13:48:29 | Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |