Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2025-11-25 14:01:15
Message-ID: a8c179f8-80e6-41cd-b930-14b6504bf7f1@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24.11.25 06:00, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I think something like attached should fix the problem, if we want to
> continue with the current example. FWIW, it demos that quotes can be
> used with labels, but we don't necessarily do that with other objects.
> I am not sure whether Peter would like to continue with the example or
> use a different one avoiding this subtlety altogether. Hence not
> including it in the overall patchset.

Let's just quote it.

I think this example set is nice because it is aligned with examples
used elsewhere in the ddl.sgml chapter, such as foreign keys and as of
recently temporal tables.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-11-25 14:05:51 Re: Patch: VACUUM should ignore (CREATE |RE)INDEX CONCURRENTLY for xmin horizon calculations
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-11-25 13:59:49 Announcing Release 20 of the PostgreSQL Build farm Client