Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
Date: 2019-09-30 03:44:13
Message-ID: a88ffd9c-04d7-a0c1-376c-918545eb4020@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/29/19 8:09 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:46:14 +1000
> Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Redis is a in memory database so I would except it to be always much
>> faster..
> Is there a way to have Redis periodically update an on-disk backup?
> That would be great, but otherwise you're at the mercy of your power
> company (here in Central Florida it's routine for power to go down and
> stay down for five hours).

It would be criminal for it not to have an async writer process flushing
modified pages to disk.  And to not have a UPS that you've tested.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-30 03:48:10 Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
Previous Message raf 2019-09-30 03:05:55 Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?