Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals

From: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pierrick Chovelon <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals
Date: 2025-09-18 09:52:12
Message-ID: a86dc8dd-131c-40a6-9734-c7fcbb64f5d6@dalibo.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry for the late reply.

On 8/29/25 20:27, Sami Imseih wrote:
> This version needs another rebase, but I don't think this is a proper solution
> yet. It's dropping the portal in an area I don't think we should be concerned
> with,

You might be right, I don't know... my understanding of the code isn't
good enough.

> and it's not covering some simple cases, like a bind/execute followed
> by a simple query.

I don't understand this part, I think that my tests prove the contrary,
don't they?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Abdiel Gonzalez Valdebenito 2025-09-18 09:56:38 Re: refactor backend type lists
Previous Message Chao Li 2025-09-18 09:44:43 Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL