Re: table partitioning and access privileges

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: table partitioning and access privileges
Date: 2020-01-30 15:54:40
Message-ID: a82339fa-37c6-be86-96b0-fa42ee981d6d@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/01/27 14:02, Amit Langote wrote:
> Fujii-san,
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:19 AM Fujii Masao
> <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2020/01/23 22:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> Thanks for updating the patch! Barring any objection,
>>> I will commit this fix and backport it to all supported versions.
>>
>> Attached are the back-port versions of the patches.
>>
>>
>> The patch for master branch separates truncate_check_activity() into two
>> functions, but in v11 or before, truncate_check_activity() didn't exist and
>> its code was in truncate_check_rel(). So I had to write the back-port
>> version
>> of the patch for the previous versions and separate truncate_check_rel()
>> into three functions, i.e., truncate_check_rel(),
>> truncate_check_activity() and
>> truncate_check_perms().
>
> Thank you for creating the back-port versions. I agree with making
> the code look similar in all supported branches for the ease of future
> maintenance.

Thanks for the check! I pushed the patches.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-30 16:02:45 Re: table partitioning and access privileges
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-01-30 15:34:33 Re: SimpleLruTruncate() mutual exclusion