| From: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: block-level incremental backup |
| Date: | 2019-04-09 16:32:30 |
| Message-ID: | a7edbb9f-c311-a3fc-39be-f2b94923e32e@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
On 09.04.2019 18:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> - It would also be nice if pg_basebackup could write backups to places
> other than the local disk, like an object store, a tape drive, etc.
> But that also sounds like a separate effort.
>
> Thoughts?
(Just thinking out loud) Also it might be useful to have remote restore
facility (i.e. if pg_combinebackup could write to non-local storage), so
you don't need to restore the instance into a locale place and copy/move
to the remote machine. But it seems to me that it is the most nontrivial
feature and requires much more effort than other points.
In pg_probackup we have remote restore via SSH in the beta state. But
SSH isn't an option for in-core approach I think.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-09 16:35:00 | Re: block-level incremental backup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-09 16:28:16 | Possibly-crazy idea for getting rid of some user confusion |