| From: | Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Drop 32-bit support (was "Re: Fix typo 586/686 in atomics/arch-x86.h") |
| Date: | 2026-03-12 15:20:17 |
| Message-ID: | a5e58f96-dc9d-48b2-82df-49f6756ef5ff@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
12.03.2026 10:57, Jakub Wartak пишет:
> I propose simply for now that that if there's consensus to drop the 32-bits
> support, then in the release notes of PG19 we could simply add some
> deprecation notice/warning like "PostgreSQL 19 is _probably_ the last release
> to provide support for 32-bits architectures. Please consider planning upgrade
> to 64-bit architecture." (and this costs us nothing, and gives any potential
> user additional year, and project would have even freedom to continue for
> couple releases still with 32-bits until somebody develops proper patch).
imho, it is possible to declare last version with 32bit support as LTS.
i.e. support Pg18 or Pg19 for 10 years instead of 5 years.
I'd vote for Pg18 to be last 32bit aware :)))
--
regards
Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-03-12 15:27:32 | Re: pg_stat_replication.*_lag sometimes shows NULL during active replication |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-03-12 15:10:51 | Re: Defend against -ffast-math in meson builds |