Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation v3

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Sjöblom <robert(dot)sjoblom(at)fortnox(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation v3
Date: 2023-06-14 13:22:46
Message-ID: a5a95dd3-c0e4-3325-04ea-9471b29213ce@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14.06.23 05:09, Amit Kapila wrote:
> The latest version looks good to me as well. I think we should
> backpatch this change as this is a user-facing message change in docs
> and code. What do you guys think?

Isn't that a reason *not* to backpatch it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-06-14 13:39:11 RE: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2023-06-14 13:16:26 Re: Do we want a hashset type?