Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date: 2017-02-22 15:14:56
Message-ID: a537995b-ccdb-f668-5f67-98e9b9b4a99d@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/17 8:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Actually, I think matviews really need to be the absolute last thing.
>> What if you had a matview that referenced publications or subscriptions?
>> I'm guessing that would be broken right now.
> I'm not sure what you have in mind here. Publications and subscriptions
> don't interact with materialized views, so the relative order doesn't
> really matter.

CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW tmv AS SELECT * FROM pg_subscription;
SELECT 0

IOW, you can create matviews that depend on any other
table/view/matview, but right now if the matview includes certain items
it will mysteriously end up empty post-restore.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-02-22 15:17:20 Re: Make subquery alias optional in FROM clause
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-02-22 15:13:59 Re: Make subquery alias optional in FROM clause