Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()

From: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()
Date: 2024-03-05 09:36:29
Message-ID: a4f29a6b-c21f-4b08-800f-d279d82b0864@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 1/3/2024 14:18, Tender Wang wrote:
> During debug, I learned that numeric_add doesn't have type check like
> rangetype, so aboved query will not report "type with xxx does not exist".
>
> And I realize that  the test case added by Andrei Lepikhov  in v3 is
> right. So in v6 patch I add Andrei Lepikhov's test case.  Thanks a lot.
>
> Now I think the v6 version patch seems to be complete now.
I've passed through the patch, and it looks okay. Although I am afraid
of the same problems that future changes can cause and how to detect
them, it works correctly.

--
regards,
Andrei Lepikhov
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2024-03-05 11:49:44 Re: BUG #18314: PARALLEL UNSAFE function does not prevent parallel index build
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-03-05 09:24:05 RE: Re:BUG #18369: logical decoding core on AssertTXNLsnOrder()

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2024-03-05 09:41:30 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-03-05 09:05:40 Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR